Comments on: Japanese General Laws of Mahjong http://www.osamuko.com Mahjong stuff Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:38:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Anonymous http://www.osamuko.com/japanese-general-laws-of-mahjong/comment-page-1/#comment-3243 Anonymous Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:17:38 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?page_id=848#comment-3243 OK. So, these "Bakatsuki Typhoon" are not the same as all rules used, there are often differences from this, such as RYANHANSHIBARI is often used, and often DOBON is not used, and KUIKAE is not always used either (but sometimes it is). These rulse just clarify what rules are used/not-used when Bakatsuki Typhoon rules are used. There is no RYANHANSHIBARI in Bakatsuki Typhoon, which is OK if you want to use these rules. What is missing is list of YAKU, because these also are often changed slightly (the only this that these rules mention is that there is no KUITAN NASHI, but it doesn't say how many points RYANPEIKOU is worth, as well as a few other things). Also, a few of the things mentioned are slightly unclear. OK. So, these "Bakatsuki Typhoon" are not the same as all rules used, there are often differences from this, such as RYANHANSHIBARI is often used, and often DOBON is not used, and KUIKAE is not always used either (but sometimes it is). These rulse just clarify what rules are used/not-used when Bakatsuki Typhoon rules are used. There is no RYANHANSHIBARI in Bakatsuki Typhoon, which is OK if you want to use these rules. What is missing is list of YAKU, because these also are often changed slightly (the only this that these rules mention is that there is no KUITAN NASHI, but it doesn't say how many points RYANPEIKOU is worth, as well as a few other things). Also, a few of the things mentioned are slightly unclear.

]]> By: Mattias http://www.osamuko.com/japanese-general-laws-of-mahjong/comment-page-1/#comment-3225 Mattias Thu, 24 Jun 2010 06:40:10 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?page_id=848#comment-3225 Thanks for translating and posting these rules! They are thorough, but still concise. Thanks for translating and posting these rules! They are thorough, but still concise.

]]>