Comments on: What Would you do? http://www.osamuko.com/2009/04/19/what-would-you-do/ Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:31:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: YAYA http://www.osamuko.com/2009/04/19/what-would-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-2207 YAYA Mon, 17 Aug 2009 01:03:46 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?p=247#comment-2207 WHAT WEBSITE DID YOU DOWNLOAD..? WHAT WEBSITE DID YOU DOWNLOAD..?

]]> By: Dookie http://www.osamuko.com/2009/04/19/what-would-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-1938 Dookie Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:51:15 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?p=247#comment-1938 i thnk id discard the 6 man and wait for a 5 man and a 9 p i thnk id discard the 6 man and wait for a 5 man and a 9 p

]]> By: Deniz http://www.osamuko.com/2009/04/19/what-would-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-205 Deniz Fri, 08 May 2009 10:38:16 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?p=247#comment-205 I think that its very unlikely that the shimo-cha has a honitsu/chinitsu. Look at his discards. Only four were dealt from within his/her hand. That should mean that he had a very organised starting hand, and was 1 shanten up to the point he dealt the 4s and riichi'd. Thats why i think the possibility of shimo-cha having a monster hand is quite low. Whats more, all the jihai are out. Only 2 chuns remain, and they are either in kami chas hand or in the remaining wall. So the shimo cha can only have a chinitsu, which is even more unlikely with just 4 switchups. I think that its very unlikely that the shimo-cha has a honitsu/chinitsu. Look at his discards. Only four were dealt from within his/her hand. That should mean that he had a very organised starting hand, and was 1 shanten up to the point he dealt the 4s and riichi’d. Thats why i think the possibility of shimo-cha having a monster hand is quite low. Whats more, all the jihai are out. Only 2 chuns remain, and they are either in kami chas hand or in the remaining wall. So the shimo cha can only have a chinitsu, which is even more unlikely with just 4 switchups.

]]> By: Perfundle http://www.osamuko.com/2009/04/19/what-would-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-142 Perfundle Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:14:10 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?p=247#comment-142 I see. From what I've seen, most attempts to declare a fourth riichi seem to be successful. I see. From what I’ve seen, most attempts to declare a fourth riichi seem to be successful.

]]> By: Osamu http://www.osamuko.com/2009/04/19/what-would-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-141 Osamu Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:43:41 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?p=247#comment-141 Perfundle: I actually riichi'd. I guess it was because if East would win the round then it'd be harder to actually come first, the 4m passed. Anonymous: No replay. Perfundle: I actually riichi’d. I guess it was because if East would win the round then it’d be harder to actually come first, the 4m passed.

Anonymous: No replay.

]]> By: TACOS http://www.osamuko.com/2009/04/19/what-would-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-128 TACOS Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:21:21 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?p=247#comment-128 3p obv 3p obv

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.osamuko.com/2009/04/19/what-would-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-126 Anonymous Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:22:43 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?p=247#comment-126 come to think of it, the 5p looks safer, since noone could have 34 but they COULD have 67. then i'd discard 3pin, then pon on 3/4 man and discard the 5 pin. now, thinking all that while you actually play would be nice. still think that the shimocha had honitsu. replay where come to think of it, the 5p looks safer, since noone could have 34 but they COULD have 67.
then i’d discard 3pin, then pon on 3/4 man and discard the 5 pin.
now, thinking all that while you actually play would be nice.
still think that the shimocha had honitsu.
replay where

]]> By: Perfundle http://www.osamuko.com/2009/04/19/what-would-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-124 Perfundle Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:22:30 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?p=247#comment-124 Taiga: And if so tossing 2p can't be worse than tossing 8p, right? Besides, it's not "all the time" that three people declare riichi simultaneously; I can't think of a better time to play defense than that. As for the discards, I doubt someone who was going for chiniisou/honiisou on manzu tiles would toss 4s that late, assuming that the light color on that tile means that it was not tsumokiri'd. I'd say it's likely that all of them have 2s, or at least tiles near 2s. By the way, Osamu, do you remember what you in fact did here? Taiga: And if so tossing 2p can’t be worse than tossing 8p, right? Besides, it’s not “all the time” that three people declare riichi simultaneously; I can’t think of a better time to play defense than that. As for the discards, I doubt someone who was going for chiniisou/honiisou on manzu tiles would toss 4s that late, assuming that the light color on that tile means that it was not tsumokiri’d. I’d say it’s likely that all of them have 2s, or at least tiles near 2s.

By the way, Osamu, do you remember what you in fact did here?

]]> By: Taiga http://www.osamuko.com/2009/04/19/what-would-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-122 Taiga Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:10:10 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?p=247#comment-122 Perfundle: >8p? That’s not a completely safe tile for any of the others, whereas 2p is for two of them. well, you can't just deal safe tiles all the time, and, judging from how everyone riichi'd and the people's ponds, the only one with a potential big hand is the shimo cha, which probably has chinitsu/honitsu on manzi tiles. also cocks Perfundle:
>8p? That’s not a completely safe tile for any of the others, whereas 2p is for two of them.
well, you can’t just deal safe tiles all the time, and, judging from how everyone riichi’d and the people’s ponds, the only one with a potential big hand is the shimo cha, which probably has chinitsu/honitsu on manzi tiles.
also cocks

]]> By: Perfundle http://www.osamuko.com/2009/04/19/what-would-you-do/comment-page-1/#comment-121 Perfundle Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:06:28 +0000 http://www.osamuko.com/?p=247#comment-121 Ah, I see. Sorry for the incorrect correction. Ah, I see. Sorry for the incorrect correction.

]]>